court accused the security guard in Paco’s condominium in Quezon City of
guard reasoned out in his testimony
“Paco and Leah
(Montalvan) went out and because he was busy entertaining Albert David (the
person in charge of the condo) he
was not able to immediately enter into his logbook Paco’s going out with
Leah at 10:15 P.M.” of
the July 16, 1997. He wrote his entry on the top page “because he had already made other entries
before he could enter Paco’s going out with Leah".
However, the court was completely silent on the other entries, which are more important. On line 10 of the same page where the court had questioned, there is an entry at 0010H (12:10 A.M. of July 17, 1997) showing what time Leah came back in. Also on line 23, there is an entry at 0245H (2:45 A.M. of July 17, 1997) what time Paco came back to his condo.
Why the necessity to ‘fix’ the log- book when one entry alone clearly established that Paco was in Manila at 2:45 A.M. of July 17, 1997. There is no way that this entry can be falsified or just added to the logbook.
Why will the defense resort to this when it would just create doubts and will destroy the credibility of the defense witness? Furthermore, if the defense wanted to ‘fix’ the logbook why write 2215H and not 2204H or 2205H to make it more credible?
Guards, for some reason or another, cannot always note down everyone who comes in or out of a place; however they can not make a mistake when they note down in the logbook who they saw coming in or out.
HOME INDEX NEXT PART